CRA Home Page
About CRA
CRA Membership Application
CRA Calendar
Carmel Beach Cleanup
CRA Newsletter
CRA Newsletters from 2008
CRA Newsletters from 2007
CRA Newsletters from 2006
CRA Newsletters from 2005
CRA Newsletters from 2004
CRA Newsletters from 2003
CRA News November 2002
CRA News October 2002
CRA News September 2002
CRA News May 2002
CRA News April 2002
CRA News March 2002 - You are here
CRA News Feb. 2002
CRA News Jan 2002
CRA Newsletters from 2001
CRA Newsletters from 2000
CRA Newsletters from 1999
Links to related web sites
CRA Photo Gallery
 

CRA News March 2002

Selected articles from the newsletter of the Carmel Residents Association

Greg D'Ambrosio
Greg D'Ambrosio, Assistant City Administrator and champion of trees and parkland, stands in front of the beautiful coast live oak tree at Carmel-by-the-Sea City Hall.
(Greg is the featured speaker for the March 28 meeting. See below for details.)

CRA Meeting -- Parks, Shoreline and In Between

Thursday, March 28 -- CRA Meeting
         4:45 p.m. -- Greg D'Ambrosio
Vista Lobos Meeting Room, Torres between 3rd & 4th
Following the meeting, delicious hot and cold hors d'oeuvres

"Parks, Shoreline and In Between"- Come one, come all to hear Greg's message

Since his tenure as City Forester and continuing until today, Assistant City Administrator Greg D'Ambrosio has been the point person on city parks and open space. He put together Mission Trail Nature Preserve, Forest Hill Park children's playground, the Beach Bluff Pathway, Vista Lobos Park and First Murphy Park as well as the recently-approved Shoreline Management Plan.

According to Greg, "Over the years, the Forest and Beach Department has consciously gone about creating new parks and pathways for pedestrian use--places where people can walk and enjoy nature." This is one of the main reasons Carmel is so attractive to residents and visitors. Using digital photos and the city's Power Point program, Greg will take us through Carmel's open spaces and parks, emphasizing the trails which wind through them. Since the early '70s, a goal of the Forest and Beach Commission has been to interconnect the city's greenbelts so that people could walk from parkland to parkland, sometimes linked by forested residential neighborhoods.

Greg has put together a map of these parklands, showing pathways through them--some of which might turn out to be discoveries even to longtime residents. In addition, he will point out the missing links--areas which could be enhanced by connector pathways, Rio Park being an example. We will also hear about design concepts for the restoration of Fourth Avenue, which recently had its giant eucalyptus trees removed. The city is applying for riparian grants which, according to Greg, "could restore the original canyon-creek habitat and turn this corridor into a safe, pedestrian-oriented greenbelt--one of Carmel's most attractive streets."

Finally, our speaker will describe the Shoreline Management Plan, which has been sent to the Coastal Commission as part of the Local Coastal Plan, and discuss projects now in the works as well as his visions for the future.

EDITORIAL

Are these city expenditures really necessary?

Over the past year, the City Council has relied heavily on consultants to perform a variety of tasks. Since January, 2001, over $300,000 has been spent or approved for a steady stream of consultants, and two more contracts are on the horizon. Certainly some consultants are necessary, but in a time of declining revenues and a high deferred-maintenance deficit, a strong case should be made to justify each of these expenditures, especially those taken from reserves. The 2001-2002 budget is $13,395,789. Out of that amount, approximately $876,000 is available for discretionary spending, the rest being encumbered for salaries, debt service and other fixed expenditures. This means that the city is using 34% of its discretionary funds this year for consultants.

These contracts include the many people hired to help with the Local Coastal Plan, also a financial consultant and two hourly-rate planners hired to beef up the understaffed Planning Department.

Let's take a look at some others--

Workplace Improvement Consultant, $10,200, Feb., 2001

The Council voted 4-1 (Livingston dissenting) to spend $10,200 for a former employee of Monterey-Salinas Transit and his partner to implement a Workplace Improvement Program. The next three phases will cost $15,000, which CRA board member Larry Rodocker told the council would have to be funded if they agreed to the initial study. City Administrator Rich Guillin said the project is needed to help with problems between the staff and council. His staff report said the intent "is to develop a working environment that allows employees to learn new operational concepts and to openly submit their proposals and ideas to management and the City Council."

Business Improvement District (BID) Consultant, $12,800, December, 2001

Both this contract and the one above appeared on the "Consent Calendar," with the intent that they would be approved automatically along with other regular housekeeping items unless "pulled off," which was done by Ely and Livingston.

After holding a series of informational meetings, the BID Committee distributed a survey to the business community and discovered that support needed for successful adoption is lacking. Many small businesses do not feel that they would benefit from the self-assessment for increased marketing to the extent that innkeepers, the measure's chief proponents, would. A business owner pointed out to the council that this is a business community issue and the city should stay out of it until they themselves decide how to handle this proposal. In an effort to beef up support, the City Council voted 4-1, with Livingston dissenting, to hire the former head of the Old Monterey Business Association for $12,800 to refashion the program in the best possible light. Her fee includes charges for nine round trips from Auburn, where she now lives, and overnight accommodations.

Traffic and Circulation Study, $20,000, February 5, 2002

McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose tentatively agreed to hire a consultant to perform a traffic and circulation study. [The item has now been delayed, presumably to avoid controversy until after the election.] The first phase would consist of reviewing existing conditions, including "mode split shares [a mysterious term to all present], parking utilization and the movement of goods and supplies to local businesses," for a cost of $20,000, to be taken from the Capital Improvement Reserve Account. Several of the proposed studies are repeats of the many traffic studies done by the city over the past ten years. Again, the consultants made it clear that this is just the beginning of the expenditures--more phases will follow.

During the public hearing, Planning Commissioner Pope Coleman, astounded at the council's eagerness to take this "big-city approach," said, "This is a plan for West Covina." He ended his comments by quoting a friend, Fred Kent, a world-renowned planner for pedestrian-oriented places, who tells all of his clients, "If you want to keep your town a good place to live, hire a traffic consultant and do exactly the opposite of what he recommends!"



How feasible is a parking garage at Sunset Center?

At two recent forums, candidates McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose have all said they are in favor of building a parking structure on the north lot of Sunset Center. Let's look at some facts:
  • The parking areas at Sunset Center, Vista Lobos and under Norton Court are rarely filled to capacity.

  • A 1990 EIR for a Sunset Center garage concluded that a large structure would not be feasible because of the noise of a ventilation system in the neighborhood which surrounds Sunset on three sides. A garage would also cause increased traffic and circulation in this residential area.

  • A 1994 survey of 936 residents nearest the commercial district showed that only 29% of the respondents favored a parking garage at the north end of Sunset Center.

  • A 1994 subcommittee of the parking 2000 Committee studied possible funding for a garage and concluded that it would not be financially feasible. The only workable method they could identify was a Parking Assessment District. At $20,000 per space, a 335-stall parking garage would cost approximately $6,600,000. At that price, the assessment on individual businesses would be $.92 per square foot--$3,220 for Toots Lagoon; $13-$15,000 for the former Dick Bruhn space. The business community members to whom they spoke were NOT interested!

  • Since the 1994 subcommittee's report, a paid parking program that would raise in excess of $1 million per year has been studied. Although shelved for the past two years, all candidates are now asking for the long-planned public demonstration. This income could conceivably be used to fund a parking garage. However, business community support for the concept of paid parking is not assured, indicated when one of the Carmel Business Association representatives on the Parking 2000 Committee formally resigned, saying he was totally against the concept of paid parking and saw no reason to participate in further discussions. In addition, if paid parking were placed on the ballot, residents, who might support the concept if funds were used to benefit the city, might not favor the program if the revenues were used to fund a garage.

  • At a cost of over $6 million, the fees charged for parking in the garage could not possibly be low enough for employees to afford. And it would be an overwhelming financial burden for employers to subsidize parking for their workers.

  • The Parking 2000 Committee was told that a parking structure at Sunset Center could not survive financially unless people were forced into it by "no parking" or "residential parking only" signs in the entire area around Sunset.


President's Message

by Monte Miller

March and April are focused on elections. I hope you all have been energized to support the candidates of your choice. The board has been getting mostly favorable comments regarding our emphasis on issues rather than endorsing candidates. I believe it was the right approach. You will find several articles in this issue of CRA News which deal with current issues and candidates' voting records. We have also reprinted below the statistical analysis of votes from our February issue.

Our candidates' forum, moderated by the League of Women Voters on February 28, was a great success. All six candidates were well prepared and the standing-room-only audience went away with a better understanding of the issues facing Carmel. We give special thanks to Rocco Cardinale whose Caffe Cardinale generously donated the delicious coffee for the forum.

I want to remind you of what issues are important to CRA as verified in last year's poll. Hopefully you will be evaluating the Carmel candidates on their views and records of support for these critical issues, a summary of which follows:

1) Our city should continue to protect its traditional character--no streetlights, sidewalks, traffic signals, street addresses, etc.

2) Our city parks and open spaces should be preserved.

3) Our historic character, residential and commercial, should be preserved.

4) Our urban forest should be maintained and preserved.

5) The city should provide mail service to elderly and disabled residents of our city. Mailboxes and street numbers should not be permitted.

6) Only one unit should be rented on lots that have both primary and subordinate units.

7) Traffic calming and street beautification should be emphasized to keep Carmel a pedestrian-oriented village.

In summary, evaluate the candidates against your views on these issues. Please be sure you are registered to vote and do so on April 9. All elections have a direct effect on the future of Carmel-by-the-Sea.

Just because you voted in the county election does not necessarily mean you are registered in Carmel-by-the-Sea. If you are in doubt, call the Monterey County Election Department at 647-7621.

Reprint from February CRA News of statistical analysis of City Council votes:

Between May 5, 2000 and December, 2001, the current City Council voted 205 times.

  • Of those 205 votes 118, or 58%, were unanimous, all five members voting alike.
  • Sue McCloud, Dick Ely, Paula Hazdovac and Gerard Rose voted as a bloc 155 times, or 76%.
  • McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose voted together 167 times, or 81%.
  • Hazdovac and Rose voted together 182 times, or 89%.
  • Hazdovac voted alone once, when Dick Ely and Rose stepped down to avoid a conflict of interest.
  • McCloud voted alone once when Hazdovac and Rose stepped down to avoid a conflict of interest.
  • Ely voted alone twice.
  • Rose voted alone 8 times, or 4%.
  • Barbara Livingston voted alone 34 times--17%.

A possible win-win solution for the Scout House!

In 1999, the Community and Cultural Commission completed a master plan for Carmel's Scout House, which outlined $283,647 in needed improvements and upgrades to make it compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other codes. This figure included a new outside elevator at an estimated cost of $177,447. At a recent candidates' forum, candidates McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose all indicated that they would like to sell the property rather than spend the money to upgrade it.

At the March 5 council meeting, a possible solution emerged. Developer John Mandurrago offered the city a donation of 1000 sq. ft., part of a lot on the corner of Junipero and Eighth, adjacent to the Scout House, on Mission and Eighth. In return, Mandurrago wants assurance that a plan to build two condominiums on the remaining 4,000 sq. ft. would be accepted.

If the city accepted this offer, viable handicapped access could be provided from Junipero through the back of Mandurrago's lot into the upper floor of the Scout House. And, if the enormous cost of the outside elevator were eliminated, there would be no reason not to renovate and preserve this charming, historic Carmel landmark.


Beach Cleanup

Saturday, March 23
10 a.m. - noon

* Volunteers meet at foot of Ocean Avenue
* Please bring gloves
* Coffee and pastries served courtesy of Caffe Cardinale and Carmel Bakery


A look at how the City Council voted on specific issues

In the February CRA News, we looked at City Council voting patterns (reprinted above). Now, as promised, we will take a look at significant votes, correlating them, when possible, with the issues listed in the President's message above.

1) Protection of Carmel's traditional character: Design Traditions Project - May 15, 2001

After four years of work, when the final Design Traditions Ordinance came to the council for approval, McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Livingston voted yes; Rose, no. During the discussion, both Hazdovac and Rose were opposed to the required 25% of lot width setback, wanting 20% instead. The 25%, allowing more room for privacy and landscaping, prevailed. Rose was opposed to the new volumetrics system.

2) Preservation of open space: Sale of Hatton Canyon to Coastal Conservancy - August 15, 2000

After the freeway had been declared officially dead, Dick Ely requested that the council provide him with direction for his action on the county Transportation Commission regarding the proposed sale of the Hatton Canyon property to preserve it as parkland. Saying they wanted to keep the possibility of a freeway alive, especially until Highway One was improved, McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose voted against sending a letter of support. Barbara Livingston, wanting to ensure that this land would be preserved as a park, supported its immediate turnover to the Coastal Conservancy.

3) Preservation of historic character: Local Coastal Plan adoption - December 6, 2001

The final vote to approve the draft of the Local Coastal Plan was 4-1. Livingston was opposed to the last-minute change allowing two units to be rented on lots which have primary and subordinate units. The Planning Commission chair asked to have the matter sent to his commission rather than rush it through, but the request was denied. Livingston felt that the Historic Preservation Ordinance was not strong enough to protect Carmel's historic character.

On October 9, 2001, the council voted 4-1 to approve design standards for the commercial district. Livingston did not support the motion because of concerns with the increase in allowed height and lot coverage which would create a tunnel effect and the lack of provision for protection of historic buildings and courtyards.

4) Preservation of the urban forest: Forest and Beach Commission tree removal appeals

There have been several appeals of Forest and Beach Commission decisions to not allow the removal of trees. On Sept. 7, 2000, McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose voted to let an applicant cut down a 15" cedar. Ely and Livingston voted no. On Sept. 11, 2001 McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose overturned two Forest and Beach decisions and allowed two Monterey pines to be cut down. Livingston voted no on each appeal, saying she would follow the advice of the City Forester and Forest and Beach Commission that these trees were healthy and safe. On Nov. 6, 2001 the same voting pattern followed on an appeal concerning the removal of a 42" pine. In Feb., 2002, the Council unanimously approved the removal of a Monterey pine when City Forester Mike Branson said that new information gave him concern about the safety of the tree.

5) Mail Delivery to elderly and disabled residents

On November 7, 2000, the Council voted unanimously for an urgency ordinance to prevent mail boxes or house numbers in Carmel. On January 9, 2001, McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose voted in favor of investigating a courier contract. Hazdovac stated for the record that she was "opposed to city funding for courier service" and if more than 200 signed up, she wanted postal service mail delivery for the entire town. Livingston voted no. On June 5, 2001, McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose voted to negotiate a contract, not to exceed $60,000, with Peninsula Messenger Service for mail delivery; Ely and Livingston wanted to give the volunteer effort a try and voted no. At the same meeting, McCloud, Ely and Livingston voted to make the urgency ordinance banning mail boxes and house numbers permanent. Hazdovac and Rose voted no and the urgency ordinance, which required four votes, failed.

6) Merging the Carmel Municipal Election - July 11, 2000

Citing the concern about low turnout, conflict with the March primary election and with budget preparation, McCloud and Livingston agreed that Carmel's election should be moved to November. In holding its own election, Carmel spends approximately $16,000 more than a consolidated election would cost. Saying that Carmel's issues would be lost, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose voted no and the measure was defeated.

7) Reducing the Size of Commissions - Sept. 19, 2000

McCloud, Ely, Hazdovac and Rose voted to reduce of the size of city commissions from 7 to 5 members. Barbara Livingston voted no.

8) Removal of a Planning Commissioner from Office - Oct. 24, 2000

After he had spoken out strongly against the reduction in the size of commissions, acting Planning Commissioner Allan Paterson was fired by McCloud, Hazdovac and Rose. Ely and Livingston, who felt this was overly harsh punishment, voted no.


CRA PROFILE
by Howard Skidmore

They're committeed to beautifying an important part of Carmel

Dorothy and Greg Cole, CRA members, live on Carmel's San Carlos Street, that part from Tenth Avenue, at the edge of Sunset Center, south to Thirteenth Avenue. For the Coles, San Carlos is more than just an address, it is also a cause and a campaign.

Like the other members of the committee for the San Carlos Street Improvement Project, the Coles think the street, the main entrance and exit to a small, picturesque village, should be more bucolically beautiful and less like a section of state highway. And they don't want a Federal grant of $155,000, vital to the work, to slip through the city's fingers, as it now is in danger of doing.

The committee's improvement project for straight and wide San Carlos--an open invitation to trucks, buses and other vehicles to step on the gas--would put trees and drought-tolerant plants in set-in plots on both sides. For tourists and others entering or leaving town, or going between downtown and the Carmel Mission, the look would be more in keeping with the rest of Carmel's "village in a forest by the sea."

Dorothy and Greg, the rest of the committee and numerous residents who have contributed, hope that the City Council will see the light on making it possible to accept the Federal grant before it expires. It would also open the way to raising an additional $30,000, either through a state grant or some other means.

City inaction may be due to fear in some parts that the improvement project would interfere with the movement of trucks serving the Sunset Center renovation. That has proved groundless, since the trucks take a different route.

Both Coles are native Californians. Dorothy was born in Compton, in the southern part of the state, and she studied art at CSU Long Beach. Upon graduation, she joined the Peace Corps, and went to war-torn Nigeria, where she taught in a United Nations-sponsored college.

Back in California, Dorothy became director of art for the Huntington Beach schools. Travel called again, and she visited Mexico and Peru, followed by living in Brazil. An elementary school teacher, Dorothy next was in Marin County and Santa Cruz.

To show her work in watercolors and acrylics, Dorothy visited a gallery in Carmel. A powerful attraction seized her, and soon she was a Carmel resident. First a waitress at the Village Corner, Dorothy was then for ten years a teacher at Bay School on the coast. She also taught art at Carmel's River School.

Whereas Dorothy felt drawn to distant places, Greg claims his first travels were around the golf course and around the pool table. Although he has created a successful business centered in Carmel, Greg likes to tell about the games-related side of his life.

He was born in Sacramento, and attended City College there. He emphasizes, however: "I played pool seriously, and I learned a lot playing pool. That was my degree." A low-handicap golfer, Greg came to Pebble Beach to caddy in the 1972 U.S. Open. He liked what he saw and came back to stay, working first as a waiter at The Lodge.

Because of his own boyhood, when his father encouraged him to become a Boy Scout and to achieve Eagle Scout rank, Greg feels a strong commitment to working with young people. After he and Dorothy met and married, Greg coached the Middle School basketball team of their daughter, Tiffany. Today he is assistant coach of the Carmel High School golf team, privileged to practice on the Pebble Beach courses.

Daughter Tiffany lives in Walnut Creek with husband Matt, their son Cole and daughter Ella. Tiffany has written a children's book and Dorothy is illustrating it. Dorothy's mother, Mrs. Mildred Vuocolo, lives in Norton Court in Carmel.

Twenty-two years ago, says Greg, "with a bucket and a pole," he started what is today the Monterey Bay Window Cleaning Company. Seventy percent of business is with commercial accounts, stretching from Napa in the north to Greenfield in the south. There are 20 employees in the busy season.

Dorothy got involved ten years ago, and set up the all-important computer operation. Now there are six computers at the office, which is at Carmel Valley Road and Carmel Rancho Boulevard. As might be imagined, the Coles have fervent words for their chosen place of abode. "We love Carmel," says one or the other. "The light is golden, the fog is mystical. We feel blessed to live here."

Dorothy, who has seen much of the world and should know, says of Carmel and its coastal setting: "This is the most beautiful place in the world."


OLD CARMEL
by Connie Wright

Dr. Arnold Genthe and his home studio

Self-portrait of Dr. Arnold GentheDr. Arnold Genthe was born in Berlin, Prussia in 1869, of an intellectual, academic and artistic family. He was educated at the Universities of Berlin and Jena. From the latter he received a doctoral degree in 1894 with a specialization in philology, archaeology and philosophy. His doctoral thesis was on a manuscript of the Pharsalia by the Roman poet Lucan. In 1894-95 he attended the Sorbonne, where he studied French literature and the history of art.

In 1895, he came to San Francisco as the tutor for the son of a German baron. He tried to sketch the mysterious Chinese in Chinatown, but the Chinese were frightened at being sketched. Completely untutored in photography, he turned to the camera and took a wonderful series, in black and white, of the Chinese in native dress. Portrait photography at the time was posed, formal and lifeless. Genthe's innovation was to take unposed, informal portraits. The subject was unaware at the time the photograph was being taken. In his autobiography, As I Remember, he says: "The emphasis was laid on portraying a person's character instead of making a commonplace record of clothes and a photographic mask." His portrait of a formidable San Francisco social lioness, Mrs. W.H. Crocker, started a stream of the wealthy and influential to his studio on Sutter Street. He was prospering in his vocation when the 1906 earthquake, fire and subsequent dynamiting of his home disrupted his career. Literally left with nothing, he borrowed a camera and took a series of photographs of the ruined San Francisco. Some of these are extremely affecting and were published internationally.

In 1906, Dr. Genthe moved to Carmel, drawn by low real estate prices and the desire to get away from the temptations of city life. He designed and built a home-studio on the east side of Camino Real between 10th and 11th. He says of it: "The sloping roof following the lines of the hills was shadowed by two great pine trees, the largest in Carmel, and was supported by four large redwood trunks, with the bark left on. A wide porch looked out to the sea. The spacious studio and living room, thirty by sixty feet with high ceilings and two skylights, was built entirely of redwood, the rafters being not box beams but solid redwood. My particular pride was the fireplace, which was large enough to take four-foot logs. And there was a cellar--the only one in Carmel--solidly built of concrete." The house-studio, although now somewhat altered, remains an important example of the Carmel Craftsman bungalow style of residential architecture built between 1906 and the 1920's.

The year 1906 was when Carmel was beginning to define its character as a haven for artists and Bohemians. Genthe's particular "cronies" were George Sterling, the poet, and frequent Carmel visitor, Jack London. These three, plus Mary Austin, Alice McGowan, her sister Grace McGowan Cooke and her two daughters, also Sinclair Lewis, the beautiful suicidal poet Nora May French and Frank Norris were part of a group which gathered on the beach for abalone and mussel parties. With Sinclair Lewis, Genthe strolled through the Carmel woods discussing philosophy in German, but both, as Genthe pointed out in his autobiography, were thinking too fondly of the fourteen year old Helen Cooke. Genthe made portraits of Sterling, London, Lewis, Norris, French and the painters Xavier Martinez and Charles Rollo Peters.

More importantly, Genthe began to experiment with color photography. The Autochrome process, invented by the Lumiere brothers in Lyon in 1905, enabled the photographer to obtain a color photograph on a glass plate. It could not, however, be printed on paper. Genthe wrote: "My first trials with this medium were made at Carmel where the cypresses and rocks of Point Lobos, the always varying sunsets and the intriguing shadows of the sand dunes offered a rich field for color experiments." Having mastered that technique, he turned to making color portraits, using as his subjects a number of beautiful women. His first ambitious endeavors in color photography were portraits of his friends, the leading Shakespearean actor and actress of the period, Edward Sothern and Julia Marlowe, costumed as Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, taken in the garden of his bungalow. In 1911, he showed his photographs, both portraits and scenes of Carmel, in San Francisco. This show was perhaps the finest exhibition of color photographs in America to that time.

Genthe, who achieved a national and international reputation, did some of his most important work in his Carmel home-studio between 1906 and the late teens, when he moved to New York. He died there in 1942.


Our Favorite Places

Village Corner - a great local place

Clayton Anderson writes, "For a delightful breakfast, lunch or dinner, consider the Leidig family's Village Corner. We are always impressed by the wonderful menu, the excellent, friendly service and the chance to dine outside at this historic Carmel site. It is cozy even outside on chilly days because of the warm fire on the patio. In the late 70's, when the Village Corner, a traditional gathering place for locals, was threatened with a second story, the preservation group Old Carmel launched a Save-the-Village-Corner campaign. Led by former Pine Cone editor Frank Lloyd [father of CRA members Jennefer Santee and Skip Lloyd], this effort was the forerunner of many of Carmel's preservation efforts, which continue today."


Good scents make good sense

Melanie Billig writes, "If you are looking for the perfect gift for a friend or a special treat for yourself, be sure to stop at Rainbow Scent Company, on the west side of Lincoln just south of Ocean Avenue. This one-of-a-kind shop carries imported soap, bath products and home fragrances. Their popular brands include Crabtree and Evelyn, Caswell Massey, Thymes and their own private label scenting. In addition, owner Ellen Weston carries other great gifts, cards and candles. She also has nice products for men, including Bay Rhum.

"Ellen Weston started the Rainbow Scent Company 20 years ago in the Barnyard. Fortunately for Carmel-by-the-Sea residents and visitors, she moved to her current location five years ago. Previously, Weston ran Crabtree and Evelyn in Carmel Plaza and she also had a store on Ocean Avenue."


Remember that your City Council is on T.V.

City Council meetings are taped and re-broadcast
Sundays, 8 a.m. - 12 noon on
KMST Channel 26

 


Carmel Residents Association
P.O. Box 13
Carmel, CA 93921
Phone: 831-620-0532
      Little house in Carmel