Nancy and Bill Doolittle Named
Citizens of the Year
The Citizen of the Year
Ceremony
took the place of the Feb. meeting. |
|
When former Carmel-by-the-Sea Chief of
Police and Master of Ceremonies Don Fuselier announced that Nancy
and Bill Doolittle were the 2002 Citizens of the Year, the audience
responded with a great roar of delight and approval.
"It would be difficult to find two people," Fuselier said, "who have contributed
more to the enhancement of Carmel's quality of life, especially in the arts
and the environment." As chairman and president respectively of the
Campaign for Sunset, the Doolittles, in partnership with the city,
have spearheaded the $21.1 million capital campaign. Their group raised
$11.65 million from the private sector and, when bids came in higher than
expected, agreed to continue efforts to raise another $1 million. Construction
is well under way with plans for the Bach Festival to open in the new facility
on July 19.
The Campaign for Sunset did not just happen in the last two years,
however. Nancy was an original member of the Sunset Center Renovation Task
Force, which first met in 1992, and she has been tirelessly working ever
since. She can be found daily in the campaign office on San Carlos Street
and, in fact, has literally turned her life over to this project. In addition
to the enormous personal involvement over the past ten years, the Doolittles
have been extremely generous with donations which, at times, were responsible
for keeping the project moving forward. They have been the best kind of
advocates a project like this could hope for--professional, nonpolitical,
intelligent, persistent and a pleasure for all to work with. Bill, a private
investment counselor, has been extremely helpful with his financial expertise
and Nancy, with an MBA from NYU, is undaunted by detailed financial spread
sheets.
Nancy and Bill have always been active on the local arts scene. She has
served as president of the Carmel Music Society and he was president of
the Monterey County Symphony. At one time, Nancy held an important position
in the administration of New York's Metropolitan Opera.
Residents of Carmel-by-the-Sea, the Doolittles have been active in countless
other campaigns and causes. In 1971, the Doolittle family owned the 16.5
acres of pristine meadow and wooded hills that today constitute the major
portion of Mission Trails Park. Two thirds of the land was suitable for
development, but the family wished to see the whole remain in a natural
state. Representing the family, Bill reached an agreement with Carmel-by-the-Sea
to donate one-third and sell for a token price two-thirds of the treasured
landscape.
In addition, Bill has taken other important roles in preserving the natural
beauty of this area. As past president of the board of trustees of the Big
Sur Land Trust, he participated in reaching agreements to keep from development
the Odello family's artichoke fields on the west side of Highway One and
the Point Lobos Ranch directly across from Point Lobos State Reserve.
In other civic areas, Bill Doolittle is the treasurer of Community Hospital
of the Monterey Peninsula, past president of the Community Foundation for
Monterey County and in 1993 took the lead in establishing the Foundation's
Fund for the Environment. He is also past president of the Carmel Rotary
Club and a former founding board member of Friends of Carmel Unified School
District.
Carmel without Nancy and Bill Doolittle would indeed be a different city--no
Mission Trails Park, no up-to-date performing arts center, and far less
leadership and support for local non-profits. Our Citizens of the Year have
truly made a difference. They have made our community a better place to
live in, work in and visit.
Thanks to Citizen of the Year Committee
The success of the Citizen
of the Year Celebration is due in large part to the committee cochaired
by Jean Southern and Carol Hilburn, which made all of the arrangements,
from flyers to food. Jean and Carol would like to thank all of the hard-working
members of this group: Barbara Livingston, Don Hilburn, Carolyn Hardy,
Frankie Laney, Helen Dietz, Janet McTurk, Larry Southern, Judy and Bernie
Furman, Larry Rodocker, Lou Ungaretti, Mary Condry, Mellanie Moran, Nina
Bayer, Peggy Purchase, Roberta and Monte Miller, Sally Williams, Shirley
Humann, Sue Jarman and Suzanne Paboojian. Thanks also go to Magdy Ibrahim
of Patisserie Boissiere for the beautiful cake, to Terrence Farrell for
the beautiful classical guitar music, to Gwen Romano, who provided the
delicious food, to the Chapman Gallery for help with framing the Vern
Yadon painting presented to the Doolittles, to Richard Peterson of Carmel
Engraver for the plaque on the painting and to Mission Linens for donating
table cloths.
We greatly appreciate the efforts made by local elected officials who
either presented or sent certificates to the Citizens of the Year. Attending
the ceremony were Mayor Sue McCloud, Fifth District Supervisor Dave Potter
and Congressman Sam Farr. State Assemblyman John Laird was unable to attend
but sent a certificate to the Doolittles.
Special thanks go to former Carmel Chief of Police and Master of Ceremonies
Don Fuselier for his time and effort.

From left, Karen and Chuck Gang and Kay Prine were seatmates at
CRA Dines Out at Nico Ristorante after the January meeting.
|
|

From left, Judy Furman and Zaza Skidmore enjoyed catching up with
friends before sitting down to a spectacular dinner at Nico Ristorante.
|
EDITORIAL
|
To follow the rules or not,
that is the question!
City commissions,
staff and the City Council have worked hard to come up with agreed-upon
policies, guidelines and city codes which protect Carmel's natural,
non-urban ambiance. So why, with these forward-thinking rules,
are both residents and the city having so much trouble interpreting
and enforcing them?
According to Building Official Tim Meroney, "The Carmel
Municipal Code and the General Plan intend that the right-of-way
area between the edge of the street pavement and private-property
lines within the residential zone be reserved for landscaping
and should remain in a natural state to preserve the village aesthetics
and character of the community."
A few months ago, a resident was allowed to keep illegal decomposed
granite in front of her house by convincing a majority of the
City Council that it helped with flooding. But another resident,
in December, was asked to remove the same substance. In January,
the council, following staff's recommendation, told a San Antonio
homeowner to remove river rocks and gravel from the city's right
of way. Council members Paula Hazdovac and Gerard Rose,
who dissented, seemed to feel that homeowners' wishes trump city
rules. In response to Mr. Rose, who disputed that this was even
"against the law," staff member Meroney left council chambers,
returned with a copy of the city code prohibiting decomposed granite
in the public right of way and read it to the council. Gravel
is a safety hazard when it gets onto sidewalks and harmful to
street sweepers when on the roads.
This trend is not limited to decomposed granite. Trees required
by the city in new construction projects are often removed or
not nurtured. Homeowners who install windows or skylights inconsistent
with code are sometimes allowed after the fact to keep them. And
so it goes.
Is there a solution? We have a few suggestions.
1) Better education is needed to inform homeowners not only of
the rules, but the rationale behind them. Councilwoman
Barbara Livingston suggested reprinting the booklet Carmel-by-the-Sea
from A-Z, which outlines such information. People also need
to understand that some rules have changed over the years, meaning
they may not be able to do the same thing a neighbor did under
previous regulations. A town hall meeting with planning staff
explaining some commonly-disputed rules, answering questions and
discussing Carmel traditions would also help.
2) More code enforcement, when financially feasible, is needed.
This would also allow staff to follow up on city requirements
for new projects to be sure that they are implemented.
3) Allowing some residents to ignore city codes is unfair to those
who obey the law. Nothing is more disillusioning in a society
than a pervasive feeling that the law isn't the same for everyone.
Above all, the City Council should be consistent, and stand firm
in upholding its policies and rules. We thank Mayor Sue McCloud
and City Council members Dick Ely and Barbara Livingston
for the steps they have recently taken in this direction.
|
COUNCIL
WATCH
Demolition, fire, traffic,
morale and pollution--a mixed bouillabaisse on council's plate
No one could have been bored
at the City Council's Feb. 4 meeting! Starting off, the council voted
4-1, with Barbara Livingston dissenting, to radically change the
definition of demolition. Promoted as a simplification for applicants,
a demolition will now be the complete removal of all above and below
ground elements of a structure except for a basement. Previously,
a project was called a demolition if it removed more than 50% of
essential parts of a building. Under the new ordinance, a project which
used to be called a demolition will now be called rebuilding. Councilwoman
Livingston had checked with 75 cities in California and all use a more
strict definition than the city's new 100% rule.
Speaking on behalf of the CRA Board, Linda Anderson said that with
this change there will probably never be another "demolition" in Carmel
because by merely leaving up a chimney or door frame, the project would
be classified as a "rebuild." The transcript of the Planning Commission
hearing on this change included discussion about problems with the Coastal
Commission and 'getting rid of the stigma of the term demolition.'
"In our opinion," she concluded, "it would be far more honest to call
a spade a spade, a demolition a demolition, rather than hide the essential
destruction of Carmel houses with the term 'rebuilding.' " Whether the
Coastal Commission will continue to only look at demolitions or will want
to see rebuilds is unknown.
A Public Safety Team report on Fire Station options, which all residents
should read, is available for purchase at Copies by the Sea. [Please see
the President's Message for details.]
A consultant team, Quality Wise, presented the results of its $10,000
study to the council. This report is also available at Copies by the Sea.
Through interviews and surveys of the council, management, general employees
and 10 residents, the group evaluated how well these groups work together,
communicate and their level of trust. On a scale of 1-5, 5 being the best,
the city scored an overall 2.6, which the consultants said was fine, but
which Larry Rodocker, who had used this process in his corporation,
thought was mediocre. The quotes throughout the study paint a picture
of a dedicated work force suffering from very low morale and a lack of
trust in the council and the administration. City Administrator Rich
Guillen said he thought that this report would help him move towards
a better working environment without having to pay the consultants for
further help.
A $20,000 traffic study, which will review previous studies, look at circulation
patterns, traffic congestion and safety issues, was approved 4-1, with
Barbara Livingston dissenting. Concerned about budget shortfalls and paying
another consultant, Councilwoman Livingston quoted the late Everett
Dirksen, who said, "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon we're
talking about a lot of money." Monte Miller, speaking for the CRA
Board, said, "With revenues down, traffic is also down. Our new Traffic
Commission and Police Chief have the expertise to handle our own very
minor traffic problems without another consultant."
Finally, with Gerard Rose dissenting, the council agreed to join
the cities of Capitola, Pacific Grove and Santa Cruz, Monterey and Santa
Cruz County and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
in adopting a resolution asking that cruise ships be prohibited from discharging
waste materials in the Monterey Bay Marine Sanctuary.
President's Message
What Is the Right Direction?
by Larry Rodocker
Maintaining a full-service fire department
versus outsourcing and upgrading the current fire station versus building
a new one at a different site have been important and controversial subjects,
as they affect the safety and "wholeness" of Carmel-by-the-Sea.
You are probably aware of what is happening on the fire station project.
There will be a seismic strengthening of the fire station, for an estimated
$400,000, to be completed during fiscal year 2003/2004, a long-overdue
project. While this is being accomplished, decisions will be made as to
whether a full-service fire department is needed or if fire and safety
protection should be outsourced. If the full-service fire department option
is selected, the second decision would be whether the current fire station
should be remodelled or a new fire station built at a different site.
The third decision is how the position of fire chief should be filled.
Since the correct decision has been made to seismic retrofit the current
fire station, I will discuss the other options.
The current fire station has been a fixture of our village for sixty-six
years. We feel and are secure and protected having this full-service
station in our downtown area, knowing that both residents and businesses
will receive instant response to any emergency. We should not look at
outsourcing our fire protection. It appears this decision is being reviewed
and made from a financial position during an economic downturn. However,
as we all know, the economy will rebound and become robust again. A decision
based on current economy over safety should never occur in Carmel. I've
also heard the argument that we have very few fires, but it only takes
one if it is your home. Also the rapid spread of a fire in our village
due to the trees, wood structures and closeness of buildings should also
be taken into consideration.
The next question is whether the existing fire station should be remodelled
or a new one built at a different site. I recently spent time touring
the fire station and feel that the building could be modernized with the
organization and service level able to grow in the remodelled facilities.
I also believe the questions of adequate space for administrative offices,
fire and EMS apparatus, future changes with vehicle sizes, proper ingress
and egress for vehicles, working and living areas for personnel, general
storage, equipment and maintenance and community room can be satisfactorily
addressed in a modernized facility at the present location. On-site training,
parking for staff and parking for responding paid-call firefighters can
also be addressed at the present location. We currently have an ideal
spot in the middle of town, equidistant from residential neighborhoods--part
of our "Carmel character." The estimated costs for a new fire station,
excluding property costs, are $4,000,000 to $5,500,000. For modernizing
the existing fire station, the costs could conceivably be half of that.
(Remember, the retrofitting costs will have been paid.)
A full-time, on-site fire chief is imperative for a progressive fire department.
This person would be in a leadership role implementing policies, procedures
and controls in a timely fashion. The Quality Wise report [see
related article] cites a need to
"Increase on-site management of the Fire House." If we combine the position
of fire chief and assistant fire chief into one position, a substantial
cost saving would be realized.
The last part of this equation is financing. The public safety team recommends
selling Flanders Mansion, the Scout House and Rio Park. There are other
viable options to which they allude, but show little interest.
Other financial options must be examined before these draconian measures
are approved. In conclusion, it is important that in making these decisions
we:
1) Maintain the highest level of safety and security for our
residents and businesses;
2) perpetuate the village character and Carmel way of life;
3) examine new revenue streams [See related
article below]; and
4) live within our means.
For such an important topic, wouldn't it be wonderful if the City Council,
residents, business owners and general community could gather for a town
hall meeting in which various opinions could be heard and discussed?
Budget Troubles Brewing at City
Hall
At the second town hall
meeting of the Carmel Forum, suggestions for new city revenues
were flying. Starting off the Jan. 21 evening, Larry Rodocker
pointed out that the city auditor warned the council in January that
"Revenues must increase someplace to keep up with the increase in expenditures."
Although invited, no member of the city staff attended the meeting to
speak about the budget. Rodocker took the audience through the 2002-2003
budget, hoping he was wrong, but projecting that the city could end
the year with a shortfall of $1,200,000. The city could recoup this
loss, he suggested, through 1) cutting expenditures; 2) selling city
assets; 3) drawing down city reserves; or 4) finding new revenue sources.
Moderator Terry Hallock recorded the wide variety of audience
comments. A panel consisting of Rodocker, former Business District Advisory
Committee Chair Mel Kline and businessman and former City Councilman
Howard Brunn, was on hand to help with the discussion. A consensus
emerged against cutting services or selling city assets. Both affect
the quality of life so important to Carmelites. Howard Brunn felt strongly
that the onetime gain from selling property was not worth the loss to
the city of appreciating assets. Some suggested that the city cut back
on hiring so many consultants and there was interest in budget-cutting
ideas put together some years ago by a staff committee dubbed "The Skunk
Works."
Everyone was energized by the creative ideas for more revenue, some
requiring voter approval, others not. Among the suggestions, many in
use in other cities, were an increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax
(TOT), a transfer tax on real estate sales, a developers' impact fee
on new projects, an epicurean tax on restaurant meals, a stormwater
utility district and more city grant writing. By a show of hands, the
audience widely approved of the transfer tax. Mel Kline said his committee
had recommended the Business Improvement District (BID), although it
was pointed out that proceeds from a BID are not controlled by the city.
Moderator Hallock said a summary of the suggestions is available at
Perspectacles on San Carlos, between 7th and 8th. The group agreed
that the next Forum should continue the discussion on revenues. Following
the March Coastal Commission meeting on Carmel's Local Coastal Plan,
another Town Hall meeting on preservation is planned.
Beach Cleanup
Saturday, February
22
(weather permitting)
10 a.m. - noon
* Volunteers meet at
foot of Ocean Avenue
* Please bring gloves
* Coffee and pastries served courtesy of Caffe Cardinale and
Carmel Bakery
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mayor Sue McCloud asked us to include
the following comment on David Maradei's Coastal
Commission Report in the January CRA News.
"David Maradei misspoke in the 3rd paragraph of his article on the Coastal
Commission on page 3 of the January issue when he cited 'the self-imposed
deadlines set by Mayor McCloud.'
"On 7 Nov 2000, Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-137 'to affirm
the completion of the LCP as the City's highest planning priority' and
'whereas the City has applied for...funds to aid in completing the Implementation
Plan by Dec 2001.' We did submit our LCP as promised by December 2001.
Since that date, the Commission staff has been reviewing and seeking clarification
of the 800-some pages in our submission. Any deadlines since Dec 2001
have been established by the Coastal staff, not by the Mayor of Carmel."
Hot Coffee Continues
For years Beach Cleanup volunteers have
enjoyed the aroma and taste of steaming-hot coffee, faithfully donated
each month by Rocco Cardinale and his parents. Now that Caffe
Cardinale has been sold, the new owners, Steve and Carolyn
Grebing, Kevin McCord and Hedi Movahedi have generously
offered to continue the tradition.
The Grebings own well-known From Scratch Restaurant in the Barnyard,
Hedi Movahedi owns Hedi's Shoe Store on Ocean Avenue and in the
Barnyard; Mr. McCord distributes organic juices.
Council member Dick Ely has also said that his Carmel Valley
Coffee Roasting Company on Ocean Avenue would be more than willing
to donate coffee. We greatly appreciate his offer.
Jimmy Hopper Lecture
The February edition of the Library's
Local History Lecture Series is entitled I, The Foam of Earth -- The
Life and Work of James Hopper. Kathleen Gakle, a scholar who
has recently completed her master's thesis on James "Jimmy" Hopper,
will discuss his life and work. Hopper was an accomplished short story
writer and newspaper correspondent who moved to Carmel in the Bohemian
era of George Sterling and Mary Austin. Until now, there
has been little work on him. This is a rare opportunity to learn about
one of Carmel's creative pioneers.
Lectures will be held on Monday, Feb. 24, at 10:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m.
in the Park Branch of the Library. Be sure to arrive early to get a seat.
Trade-offs for New County Plan
Aren't Easy!
We can either decide what we want to
look like in the future or just let it happen with Silicon Valley and
the developers deciding for us." The choice is ours, according to Assistant
County Administrative Officer Jim Colangelo, who led CRA members
at the January meeting through the process of putting a new general plan
together for Monterey County.
The current plan, last updated in 1982, "has good policy language but
not enough teeth." said Colangelo. It creates a "field day for land-use
attorneys and some environmentalists who want to fight everything. They
like the lack of clarity." Current policies, he says, are pushing us to
become another San Jose, with a loss of farmland, development separate
from job locations and housing dispersed throughout environmental habitats.
"As a county, we have done a great job of building houses on golf courses!"
he lamented.
If all goes as Mr. Colangelo hopes, the new plan will "put 20 years of
land use battles into one document--settling issues and creating a blueprint
for the future." He admits, however, that when you get down to the details,
the trade-offs are difficult. The big issues are the same all over the
county--water, ag preservation, affordable housing, traffic. But they
mean different things to different people. "If you say 'ag-land preservation'
in San Ardo, he said laughing, "you get run out the door." They are, for
obvious reasons, more interested in preservation of jobs and housing.
The broad goal of the plan is to define areas that are appropriate for
growth and those that should be protected. Development should be close
to existing cities, leaving enough area between them to maintain a distinction,
rather than creating another Orange County, where one city runs into another.
Other critical issues are affordable housing near job sites, transportation
and water infrastructure funding, preservation of resources, economic
development and protection of property rights. But, said Colangelo, subdivisions
must be limited. "People have an opportunity, but not a right,
to subdivide their land."
After a series of public meetings around the county, a draft plan went
to the Board of Supervisors last July. Then came a parade of 270 property
owners asking for special changes, of which the supervisors granted 80.
Our county will grow no matter what. In the 1990s, higher birth over death
rates alone created a 5,000 per year increase. The Association of Monterey
Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) predicts that county population will go from
400,000 to 550,000 in the next 5 years. "We can't do supply and demand,"
said Colangelo, "because the demand comes from all over the world. We
have to stop somewhere."
Ironically, the Peninsula cities have the lowest housing allocation but
most of the jobs. The effort to put more affordable housing at Ft. Ord
has stumbled 1) because Marina and Seaside want higher-end housing, feeling
that they already provide a great percentage of affordable homes, and
2) because water on the county portion of Ft. Ord has already been allocated
to various entities--CSUMB and the army, probably more than they need.
Once the plan is finalized, Jim Colangelo feels that the only way to actually
implement it will be through a county-wide ballot measure for approval
of a sales-tax increase to fund roads and necessary infrastructure improvements.
This would probably take place in two years.
"Pre-planning" Your Home
by Carmel Fire Department Captain Mitch
Kastros
A pre-plan is a strategy for
something we hope will never happen, while at the same time reducing the
chance of that event taking place. Firefighters conduct pre-plans of homes,
buildings, city blocks, neighborhoods, forest and grassy areas to help
prepare for possible fire and/or safety problems that could occur at any
time. Pre-plans also include preventive measures to help detect potential
hazards and address them before they become serious problems.
For instance, when the fire department pre-plans a building, we learn
the best ways to get in and out. We find out if there are flammable liquids,
chemicals, confined spaces and electrical issues in the building. We determine
what the building is made of and what the potential is for collapse during
a fire. We learn where the natural gas and electrical mains are, and alternate
escape routes if our primary one is blocked.
We can all use this same type of strategy to pre-plan our own homes with
regard to fire and life safety. For example:
- Are our bedrooms upstairs or downstairs,
do we sleep with the door open or closed, and what are our escape routes
if we wake up to a fire? We should have more than one escape route and
a safe place outside for everyone to meet.
- Do small children or adults with
limited or no mobility live with us, and is there a plan to get them
out of the house if necessary?
- If there is a medical emergency in
our home, can bedrooms and other critical areas of the house be easily
accessed to remove potential patients?
- Have we moved flammable liquids away
from furnaces and water heaters and out of the house?
- Are our smoke detectors working and
tested regularly?
- Are swimming pools and hot tubs secure
from having someone accidentally fall in?
- Is the kitchen safe for children
to not get burned or cut, and are cabinets and medicine chests childproof?
- Do we know how to properly access
"911" and report an emergency?
These are some of the things to consider
when pre-planning our home, and similar strategy can be applied in the
workplace as well. Not everyone's home is the same, but it is fairly easy
to spot a potential problem or hazard that shouts, "Watch out!" If you
need assistance in pre-planning and locating hazards in your home, call
the fire department at 620-2030 and ask for "B" Shift to come and help
you.
OLD CARMEL
by Connie Wright
Frank and Jane Gallatin Powers
Carmel-by-the-Sea is celebrating the
centenary of the formation of the Carmel Development Company and it seems
fitting to celebrate the lives of two of its little known, but important
citizens as well.
Frank Powers (1864-1920) was a Berkeley graduate and a successful San
Francisco attorney when he married Jane Gallatin (1868-1944), the daughter
of Albert Gallatin of Sacramento, who made a fortune during the Gold Rush.
Frank became interested in land speculation and bought up large amounts
of Carmel real estate until he owned about three-quarters of what is now
Carmel. When the Carmel Land Development Company was founded, Frank Powers
was president. Frank Devendorf was not a stockholder or board member,
but rather, a paid employee. Powers provided much of the money for the
Development company and the financial direction and legal expertise, while
Devendorf provided the managerial skills for selling the property. Devendorf
was not the sole father of Carmel.
When the Powers moved to Carmel in 1904, Jane was a well-regarded professional
painter and a San Francisco socialite. Frank loved every tree, rock and
cove of Carmel and every person he ever met, and was fascinated by the
arts. Their house on San Antonio near the Carmel gate was a log cabin
with a dirt floor. A barn on the property, built in 1864, became Jane's
studio and was the first artist's studio in Carmel. Jane and Frank had
four children: Madeleine, Polly, Dorcas Jane and Gallatin. Jane became
a founding member of the Carmel Arts and Crafts Club, the forerunner of
the Carmel Art Association. Both Jane and Frank encouraged their artistic
San Francisco friends to settle in Carmel. In 1912 Jane fell in love with
a painter named Funk and went to Italy with him, leaving Frank and the
children behind. She returned shortly, but Frank altered his will leaving
her only a monthly allowance. Frank sold their Carmel property in 1920
and died six months later. Jane soon moved to Paris with Polly, Dorcas
Jane and Gallatin. Before leaving, she burned all of her Carmel paintings.
Jane set up studios in Paris, Capri and Rome, where her paintings were
shown. Both Polly and Dorcas Jane married Italian nobility. Dorcas died
in 1929 and the depression severely curtailed Jane's monthly allowance.
In 1941, Polly and her husband were interned by the British, and Jane's
funds were completely cut off, as was communication with her frantic family
in America. In 1944 she was discovered by her grandson in Rome, living
in abject poverty with very little food, but surrounded by 14th century
antiques. Jane died shortly after his visit. In 1980, dozens of her Italian
paintings were discovered in the basement of daughter Madeleine's Carmel
house.
Frank and Jane Gallatin Powers have lived on through their children, grandchildren,
great grandchildren and great-great grandchildren, who have been and are
presences on the Monterey Peninsula, but the city of Carmel has seen fit
only to dedicate a footpath in Jane's memory.
Remember that your City Council
is on T.V.
City Council meetings
are taped and re-broadcast
Sundays, 8 a.m. - 12 noon on
KMST Channel 26
|